It’s Safety New Zealand Week. This morning I was reading in the Dominion Post of a renewed campaign to alert us to dangers at home. Apparently last year more than 650,000 of us were injured in the home – one every 48 seconds. Staggering!
This afternoon ACC kicked off its campaign with a statement detailing more grim statistics. These include more than 17,000 accidents in bathrooms each year, 87 stair-related accidents every day, and 133 injuries per week to children from running through glass or falling from windows.
Last year we paid out $622 million through our ACC levies for the treatment and rehabilitation of people injured in the home. (I love the way ACC refers to “New Zealanders” and “their” levies, as if they are from another country.)
We’re obviously a careless bunch because in the past 12 months 5,400 people were injured using a ladder at home – that’s 15 people every day. Never mind that this equates to a significantly-sized town of ladder victims alone.
Having Safety Week has to be a good thing, but I would like to know how we fare in relation to other OECD countries. I suspect these figures are not apparent because others don’t have such generous systems as our ACC, and they simply have to fork out for their own carelessness. Or it is just the male can-do attitude that gets us into trouble around the home and up ladders.
I’ve seen lot of ACC television adverts over the years – people tripping over toys and the like – and sometimes I wonder whether we’ve become too self reliant on others doing our thinking for us. Perhaps this is why we are so accident prone.
Now I’ve not been above carelessness myself over the years, with a busted elbow and compound fracture of the arm. Discreetly I did this outside the home.
Perhaps one answer is to have a home-accident prosecution system akin to the workplace one.
Other possible solutions are living away from home, having only single storey dwellings without roofs, licensing the use of ladders, or hiring an expert, which would make many of these incidents workplace claims. Just a thought.


Given the public discussion around the Kelston Boys vs. Auckland Grammar rugby game brawl it has been interesting to see the marked difference between how the two schools have reacted through their communication with their pupils and the wider public.