<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PR Matters &#187; ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prmatters.co.nz/tag/ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prmatters.co.nz</link>
	<description>fresh thinking - influential communication</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Curious questions for a new decade</title>
		<link>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/curious-questions-for-a-new-decade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/curious-questions-for-a-new-decade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 23:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane Dodd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media landscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2020]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4th state principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crusaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New decade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social responsibility]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prmatters.co.nz/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Where did the man on the street go?
Web 2.0 where? We wondered if the exuberance around the democratising power of the all-access-internet we saw mid-decade hasn’t become a bit deflated in the past year or so. Could the man on the online street have been shouted out by the noisier and better resourced?
With a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/curious-questions-for-a-new-decade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Media gets a dose of ethics from the FTC</title>
		<link>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/new-media-gets-a-dose-of-ethics-from-the-ftc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/new-media-gets-a-dose-of-ethics-from-the-ftc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloggers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Trade Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Endorsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New influencers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media campaigns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prmatters.co.nz/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s fair to say that traditional media has envied the huge freedoms Internet publishers enjoy. On the Internet, any man and his dog can be publishers, editors, ad sales people – at the same time, without the “Chinese Walls” traditional media like newspapers and television are required to have, to avoid accusations of bias and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/new-media-gets-a-dose-of-ethics-from-the-ftc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No lipstick please..</title>
		<link>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/no-lipstick-please/</link>
		<comments>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/no-lipstick-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media landscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRINZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PRSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prmatters.co.nz/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) is challenging the Presidential candidates to commit to maintaining the highest standards of ethical practice in their campaign communications by inviting them to make a formal pledge to abide by the PRSA Code of Ethics.
 
“The use of innuendo, incomplete information, surrogate messaging and character attacks, whether in political [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.prmatters.co.nz/no-lipstick-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
